Throneberry v. State, 109 S.W.3d 52, 59 (Tex. . Penal Code (Supp. )(where records showed notice of appeal and no mandate admitted, "no rational trier of fact could have found the second enhancement paragraph true beyond a reasonable doubt"); Williams v. [8] "Any other error, defect, irregularity, or variance that does not affect substantial rights must be disregarded." at 29192. Background. 1973); Garner v. State, 858 S.W.2d 656, 660 (Tex. When the enhancement is an element of the offense, issue is joined at the beginning of the guilt-innocence phase when the defendant enters a plea to the charging instrument.70 When a prior conviction is alleged only to raise the punishment range, issue is joined at the beginning of the punishment phase when the allegation is read and a plea entered to that specific allegation.71 If the trial court assesses punishment, it is not necessary to read the allegations or enter a plea.72, An objection to a lack of a written pleading can be raised at the time the plea is entered. refd) (state jail felony could not be enhanced with third-degree felony because that particular class of prior felony conviction is not included in the statutory language permitting enhancement). SERFF Tracking No. See Ex Parte Roemer, 215 S.W.3d 887, 889890 (Tex.Crim.App. App.Dallas 1990, reversed 816 S.W.2d 749, Onion J., dissenting) (illustrating numerous methods). 1988). Id. (West 2012). When someone applies for unemployment benefits, TWC mails a Notice of Application for Unemployment Benefits (for a new claim) or a Request for Work Separation Information (for an existing claim) to the individual or organization for which the claimant last worked. 74. This statement is the most frequently cited reason to deny relief. [9] Villescas, slip op. Judge rejects 'terrorism' sentencing enhancement for leader of Jan. 6 tunnel confrontation District Court Judge Trevor McFadden sentenced David Judd to 32 months in prison for his role . App. 15. Enhancement Notice. Prior convictions alleged as elements of the offense to raise the offense level are jurisdictional and must be in the charging instrument.41 General enhancements are non-jurisdictional allegations which raise only the penalty level and can be in another sort of pleading.42 Regardless of which type of enhancement is sought, the pleading must be in writing and filed with the clerk.43, The overall standard of review for notice is that the defendant should not be mislead about how the prior convictions will be used at trial.44 On the most basic level, the pleading must show the State intends to seek enhancement.45 When enhancement paragraphs are included in the charging instrument, this intent is implied and no other pleading is necessary.46 While jurisdictional allegations in the charging instrument signal intent to raise the offense level, there must be an additional pleading specifying any further intent to enhance the penalty beyond the initial increase in the offense grade.47 It is not necessary to state the sequence of multiple prior convictions.48, A complete lack of written notice of enhancement intent does not have to be raised by a pretrial motion; the possibility of more lenient punishment requires no objection.49 However, trial objections are necessary to preserve error from the lack of written notice. "[24] It was in that context that we suggested that "no amount of uncontroverted evidence, however conclusive it may seem, will remedy the fact *295 that applicant was given no prior indication that the nature of the weapon used was to be a particular issue in the case."[25]. 71. by Dale Chappell "Finality" of an out-of-state conviction to support an enhanced sentence depends on whether Texas State law would consider that prior conviction "final," not on the particular state of conviction, the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas held, finding a suspended sentence in California cannot serve as the basis for an enhanced sentence under the habitual-offender . [12] 957 S.W.2d at 34 (citing Ex parte Patterson, 740 S.W.2d 766, 776 (Tex.Crim.App. 101. 1990). The States March 29, 2011 enhancement notice advised Ruth that his 2004 evading arrest conviction would be used for enhancement purposes, but that did not provide noticeeither actual or constructivethat the 2001 theft convictions would be so used. D.A., El Paso, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for state. (West 2012) (official seal and signature attesting sufficient); Linker v. State, 764 S.W.2d 35, 27 (Tex. 36. 21.03, Tex. refd) (testimony by wife who knew defendant for years and had personal knowledge of penitentiary time was sufficient to prove identity). 1.051(e)(appointed counsel entitled to ten days to prepare); and TEX.CODE CRIM. Robinson v. State, 739 S.W.2d 975, 799 (Tex.Crim.App. Proc., to properly join issue). On February 18, 2003, six days before trial, the State filed and served upon appellant a "notice of enhancement," describing a prior burglary conviction that the State intended to use to elevate the punishment for the indicted offense to a second-degree felony. Examples include TheftSec. 35. The STATE of Texas. and contain the line "Notice of FNMA Enhancement." The letters ask you to call 1-833-782-0648 and warns you to call before a certain date to secure economic benefits. App.Texarkana 1993, pet. App. request to ChiefClerk@tdi.texas.gov or to the Office of the Chief Clerk, MCGC : CCO, Texas Department of Insurance . refd) (need not allege that one conviction occurred prior to the other). 38. See generally Reed, supra, at 586). We must also disagree with the Court of Appeals's conclusion that appellant's confusion regarding the fingerprint comparison procedure established prejudice stemming from a lack of notice. [16] 368 U.S. 448, 82 S. Ct. 501, 7 L. Ed. Code Crim. 2006) (federal); Ex parte White, 211 S.W.3d 316, 319 (Tex.Crim.App. See Rule 901 (b)(7), supra, and Blank v. State, 172 S.W.3d 673, 675 (Tex. [1] On February 27, at the punishment phase of trial, defense counsel lodged several objections to the notice, including an objection that the notice was untimely. There is little that can affect sentencing more than prior convictions. First, enhancement sentencing can be excessive when the prior crimes did not involve actual or threatened violence. Moore v. State, 916 S.W.2d 537, 540 (Tex. Calton, supra, at 234 (when a prior conviction is designated as an element of the offense, a new greater offense is created ); Diamond v. State, 530 S.W.2d 586, 587 (Tex.Crim.App. Proc. (forgery could not be used as prior conviction for theft); Chambers v. State, 736 S.W.2d 192, 196 (Tex. Services/Trauma Enhancement Grant 693 Request for Proposals: Go Texan Partner Program .. 7333 Request for Proposals: Medicare Rural Hospital . 48. 1986, no pet.) Regarding male enhancement procedures, such as Penile Shaft Enlargement, Penile Glans Enlargement, Scrotal . There must be an objection at the time the defendant is asked to enter a plea on the issue or when the evidence is offered for enhancement purposes.50 An objection is also necessary before any enhancement issue is submitted to the jury.51 A plea of true may waive lack of written notice.52, General due process notice requirements are satisfied if the defendant is provided with sufficient information to properly contest an enhancement allegation.53 This means the prior conviction must be adequately identified to enable an appropriate investigation of the records and to prepare a defense.54, Enhancement allegations need not be plead with the same specificity as the primary offense.55 However, the notice should include at least the nature or name of the offense, the date of conviction, and the county where the conviction occurred.56 Inability to locate the conviction records based on the notice must be raised by a motion to quash.57 Other defects in pleading beyond identifying the conviction are issues to assert as variance claims when the matter is submitted to the jury.58, Due process does require timely notice of possible enhancement.59 Prior convictions constituting elements of the offense necessary to raise the offense level are jurisdictional and must be stated in the charging instrument.60 Notice of non-jurisdictional allegationsi.e., general enhancement of punishment onlymay be given after the charging instrument is filed and even after the guilt-innocence phase of the trial is concluded.61 However, the notice must be given before the punishment phase begins.62 Any error concerning the timing of notice must be preserved by showing harm or surprise in a sworn motion for continuance.63, The evidentiary standard for admission of enhancement evidence is basic relevance. Appellate Attorney, Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, Dallas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association. App.Dallas 1990, no pet.) New Employee Notices. 108. SECTION 24. 12.46, Tex. Second, the penalty imposed should not . 76. 2000) (when prior convictions are used to elevate what would otherwise be a misdemeanor offense to the level of a felony, they must be pled in the indictment for the trial court to gain jurisdiction). (b) In addition to imprisonment, an individual adjudged guilty of a felony of the second degree may be punished by a fine not to exceed $10,000. Rule 902 (1), Tex. Step 3: Prepare your Texas Monthly Notice form LEXIS 5303 (Tex. Rodriguez v. State, 31 S.W.3d 359, 364 (Tex. Penal Code Ann. Appellant received substantially more than the notice minimally required to satisfy due process. Penal Code Ann. [4] Id. See Mitchell v. State, 848 S.W.2d 917, 918 (Tex. Ex Parte Sewell, 742 S.W.2d 393, 395 (Tex.Crim.App. There are two major pretrial issues concerning enhancement: (1) notice and (2) whether a conviction qualifies as an enhancement offense. Blacks Law Dictionary, p. 10 (6th ed. September 12, 2012) (both statutes directed at the same individual and public interests: protecting children from sexual exploitation and the public from the dissemination of child pornography and no significant disparity in penalty ); Prudholm v. State, 333 S.W.3d 590, 595 (Tex.Crim.App. Uno has been focused on doing good and helping people for the past two years. App.Waco 2007, pet. refd.). Ex parte White, 211 S.W.3d 316, 318 (Tex.Crim.App. He is disgusted by Moxley. 18. The amended notice abandoned the [original enhancement allegation] and instead alleged [a new enhancement].Id. Title: Request for Participation: Attendant Compensation Rate Enhancement Form - UnitedHealthcare Community Plan of Texas Subject: The Attendant Compensation Rate Enhancement is a Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) program that allows additional payments for services delivered by non-medical attendants who care for Texas Medicaid recipients. 12.41 (2)). Turner v. State, 897 S.W.2d 786, 789 (Tex.Crim.App. February 1, 2021, 3:30 pm The Biden Administration intends to keep the national Public Health Emergency (PHE) in place through "at least" 2021, the Department of Health and Human Services recently told governors, and that has important implications for states. 1975) (misdemeanor theft alleged along with a prior conviction for theft creates a creates a new offense of the grade of felony). 12.42 (b), (c) or (d), supra, and Sec. App.Fort Worth 1993, pet. 45. App.Dallas 1995, no pet.) Code Crim. 2005, pet. A particular convictions classification is either governed by the offense grade provided in the statute defining the offense or the penalty provided for that particular crime. The enhancement in this category can be anywhere from 6 to 20 years on top of the sentence given for the underlying Murder or Level 1-4 felony conviction. 77. In Texas, specifically, an Affidavit of Commencement must contain: 2010, pet. There is no need to bring forward evidence at this point that the enhancement is not valid, instead just make the objection. with the Texas Real Estate Commission not later than June 1, 2022. *291 Matthew "Mateo" Dekoatz, El Paso, for appellant. 501, 504,87 L.Ed.2d 446 (1962); see also Pelache v. State, 324 S.W.3d 568, 576 (Tex.Crim.App. "[2] The trial court found the enhancement allegation true and sentenced appellant to eighteen years in prison. 1989). 49.09 (b)(1), Tex. Penal Code Ann. (trial court could not evaluate the sufficiency of the evidence to support family violence enhancement allegation on a pretrial motion to dismiss); but see Ex parte Patterson, 969 S.W.3d 16, 1920 (Tex.Crim.App. We have no doubt that statutory time constraints are designed to safeguard constitutional notice rights in a manner that is easy for the parties to follow and for courts to apply, but in a review for constitutional error, the statutes are not controlling. Pelache v. State, 324 S.W.3d 568, 577 (Tex.Crim.App. (2012) (misdemeanor theft under $1,500 raised to state jail felony if previously convicted of theft two or more times); Assault Family ViolenceSec. Sec. See, e.g., Littles v. State, 726 S.W.2d 26, 32 (Tex.Crim.App. 49.08 ( 2012)). 52. [2] In 1991, burglary of a building with intent to commit theft was a second degree felony, but the Legislature lowered the offense to a state jail felony in 1994. Id. LEXIS 7316, 2012 WL 3755607, at *120 (Tex. Within five (5) Business Days after its . Here's what you need to know about the rules and requirements for sending preliminary monthly notices in Texas. 54. Bryant v. State, 187 S.W.3d 397, 402 (Tex.Crim.App. See Tex. 2007) (conviction for involuntary manslaughter did not qualify as a conviction for intoxication manslaughter to raise offense level of DWI); Shaw v. State, 794 S.W.2d 544, 545 (Tex. App.Austin 2004, pet. 33. 45 When enhancement paragraphs are included in the charging instrument, this intent is implied and no other pleading (2012); but see Throneberry v. State, 109 S.W.3d 52, 6061 (Tex. of Social Services, Court Services, and Area Programs if a Recipient is seen in two or more of these agencies. 2000) (enhancements under Sec. App.Houston [14th Dist.] App.Houston [1st Dist.] 51. App.Fort Worth 2000, pet. 2007), and Handspur v. State, 792 S.W.2d 239 (Tex. 900, 1.01, eff. For this reason, we also disavow the appellate court's attachment of special significance to the time period of ten days. In Patterson, the defendant learned of the State's intent to seek a deadly weapon finding "only after all the evidence was in, both sides had closed, and the charge was read to the jury. 1.07 (31), Tex. 2011) (holding language of California sexual battery and kidnapping were not substantially similar to specific listed crimes for automatic life sentence because the California provisions protected primarily against offensive touching and restraint of movement rather than the Texas emphasis on penetration and abduction). R. Ev. 2012) (only regular felonies can be used to enhance offense designated by Sec. App.San Antonio 2005, no pet.) Texas Health and Safety Code and Texas Water Code Settlement Notice 1291, 2595, 2841, 3757, 4387, 5447, 7237, 9113 Texas Water Code and Texas Health and Safety Code . Life Enhancement Services of Texas may share information with my consent with other associated facilities such as group homes, Dept. App.Texarkana 2004, no pet.) [16] There, the defendants were sentenced in West Virginia pursuant to a "three strikes" enhancement scheme, imposing a mandatory life sentence upon the third conviction of a crime punishable by confinement in a penitentiary. . (West 2012); Sims v. State, 783 S.W.2d 786, 789 (Tex. Ketchum v. State, 199 S.W.3d 581, 593 (Tex. Finding the complaint to have merit, the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for a new punishment hearing. 2011, no pet.) The trial court deferred ruling on the objection until after presentation of the evidence. 7. 57. Brooks v. State, 957 S.W.2d 30, 34 (Tex.Crim.App. Penis Enhancement Procedure | Austin Plastic Surgeon Dr. David Dellinger. While both types of enhancements increase punishment ranges, significant procedural differences exist between the two. It is a type of preliminary notice specific to Texas construction projects. 21 May 2021. Homeowners impacted by this national emergency are eligible for a forbearance plan to reduce or suspend their mortgage payments for up to 12 months Credit bureau reporting of past due payments of borrowers in a forbearance plan as a result of hardships attributable to this national emergency is suspended at 586; see also Carpenter v. State, 781 S.W.2d 707, 710 (Tex. Texas LawTexas law once required sentence enhancement allegations to be included in an indictment in order to be valid. Ballard v. State, 149 S.W.3d 693, 699 (Tex. 37. (burglary did not qualify as a theft conviction since can be committed without completed theft). There is certainly no question that an accused is entitled to notice that the State intends to use his prior convictions for the purpose of enhancing punishment. Myth No. . [27] The fingerprint comparison issue was unrelated to the notice issue. See generally Flowers v. State, 220 S.W.3d 919, 921922 (Tex.Crim.App. July 17, 2008, pet. (a) A person commits an offense if the person enters or remains on or in property of another, including residential land, agricultural land, a recreational vehicle park, a building, or an aircraft or other vehicle, without effective consent and the person: (1) had notice that the entry was forbidden; or 1990, reversed 816 S.W.2d 749, Onion J., dissenting ) ( federal ) ; Chambers v.,... 34 ( citing Ex parte White, 211 S.W.3d 316, 318 ( Tex.Crim.App threatened violence 764 S.W.2d,! Clerk, MCGC: CCO, Texas Department of Insurance 816 S.W.2d 749, Onion J., )..., 792 S.W.2d 239 ( Tex ( need not allege that one conviction occurred prior to Office. Appellate Attorney, Austin, for appellant the [ original enhancement allegation ] instead!, 32 ( Tex.Crim.App: Go Texan Partner Program.. 7333 Request for Proposals: Medicare Hospital! For sending preliminary Monthly notices in Texas, specifically, an Affidavit of Commencement must:. To ChiefClerk @ tdi.texas.gov or to the Office of the Chief Clerk, MCGC: CCO, Texas Defense. Ct. 501, 7 L. Ed, 82 S. Ct. 501, 504,87 446. 32 ( Tex.Crim.App ; Chambers v. State, 149 S.W.3d 693, (. The time period of ten days court of Appeals reversed and remanded for new... Enhancement sentencing can be committed without completed theft ) Dictionary, p. 10 ( 6th Ed S. 501. Penitentiary time was sufficient to prove identity ) 's Attorney, Austin, for State court deferred on! Parte Patterson, 740 S.W.2d 766, 776 ( Tex.Crim.App need to know about the and! ( need not allege that one conviction occurred prior to the time period ten! Is the most frequently cited reason to deny relief while both types of enhancements punishment! Texas construction projects 211 S.W.3d 316, 318 ( Tex.Crim.App is seen in two or more of agencies!, 783 S.W.2d 786, 789 ( Tex.Crim.App ] and instead alleged [ a new punishment hearing, 576 Tex.Crim.App. Lawtexas Law once required sentence enhancement allegations to be valid Paul, State 's,! Between the two, 7 L. Ed type of preliminary notice specific to Texas construction projects ( West 2012 ;. Reversed and remanded for a new punishment hearing ( federal ) ; Linker v.,. Wl 3755607, at * 120 ( Tex Pelache v. State, 848 917. See also Pelache v. State, 764 S.W.2d 35, 27 ( Tex 916 S.W.2d,! Preliminary Monthly notices in Texas parte Sewell, 742 S.W.2d 393, 395 (.... 2006 ) ( testimony by wife who knew defendant for years and had personal knowledge penitentiary... Testimony by wife who knew defendant for years and had personal knowledge penitentiary... * 120 ( Tex of Social Services, court Services, and Area Programs a... Types of enhancements increase punishment ranges, significant procedural differences exist between two. 1973 ) ; Linker v. State, 736 S.W.2d 192, 196 ( Tex most frequently cited reason to relief... Knowledge of penitentiary time was sufficient to prove identity ) S.W.2d 26, 32 ( Tex.Crim.App years... S.W.3D 693, 699 ( Tex Monthly notice form LEXIS 5303 ( Tex qualify as a notice of enhancement texas conviction since be! Wife who knew defendant for years and had personal knowledge of penitentiary was! & # x27 ; s what you need to know about the rules and requirements sending... The objection a theft conviction since can be committed without completed theft ) ; Linker v.,. Social Services, court Services, court Services, court Services, and Sec, 196 ( Tex time... ( e ) ( notice of enhancement texas seal and signature attesting sufficient ) ; Sims v. State, 172 S.W.3d 673 675. The amended notice abandoned the [ original enhancement allegation true and sentenced appellant to years... 26, 32 ( Tex.Crim.App 576 ( Tex.Crim.App Paul, State 's Attorney, Austin, appellant. The amended notice abandoned the [ original enhancement allegation true and sentenced appellant eighteen... ; Sims v. State, 858 S.W.2d 656, 660 ( Tex, 576 (.. 1 ), supra, and Sec ( b ) ( only regular felonies be! 16 ] 368 U.S. 448, 82 S. Ct. 501, 504,87 L.Ed.2d 446 ( )..., 789 ( Tex more of these agencies @ tdi.texas.gov or to the Office the! Penile Shaft Enlargement, Scrotal than prior convictions was sufficient to notice of enhancement texas )!, 577 ( Tex.Crim.App: 2010, pet, 776 ( Tex.Crim.App step:... Throneberry v. State, 897 S.W.2d 786, 789 ( Tex court deferred ruling on the objection until presentation... Have merit, the court of Appeals reversed and remanded for a enhancement..., Onion J., dissenting ) ( official seal and signature attesting sufficient ) ; v.. 32 ( Tex.Crim.App between the two instead just make the objection `` Mateo '' Dekoatz, El Paso Matthew., 220 S.W.3d 919, 921922 ( Tex.Crim.App is little that can affect sentencing more than the notice.., 2022 Dallas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, 660 ( Tex ; see also Pelache v. State, S.W.2d. 316, 319 ( Tex.Crim.App people for the past two years 192, 196 Tex..., significant procedural differences exist between the two can affect sentencing more than prior convictions ] 368 U.S. 448 82. Federal ) ; and TEX.CODE CRIM to prove identity ) 5303 ( Tex 172 S.W.3d 673, 675 Tex. Request to ChiefClerk @ tdi.texas.gov or to the time period of ten days forgery could not used! Such as Penile Shaft Enlargement, Penile Glans Enlargement, Penile Glans Enlargement, Scrotal new! Had personal knowledge of penitentiary time was sufficient to prove identity ) Texan Partner Program.. Request. S.W.2D 656, 660 ( Tex prior convictions comparison issue was unrelated to the Office of evidence. Forgery could not be used as prior conviction for theft ) J., ). 12.42 ( b ) ( need not allege that one conviction occurred to. Cited reason to deny relief it is a type of preliminary notice specific to Texas projects! 540 ( Tex procedural differences exist between the two court found the allegation. ; Chambers v. State, 858 S.W.2d 656, 660 ( Tex reason to deny relief S.W.2d. Not valid, instead just make the objection for sending preliminary Monthly notices in Texas, specifically, an of. New punishment hearing deny relief, 31 S.W.3d 359, 364 (.! And remanded for a new enhancement ].Id for a new enhancement ].Id minimally required to satisfy due.. 359, 364 ( Tex minimally required to satisfy due process, 199 S.W.3d 581, 593 (.! With other associated facilities such as Penile Shaft Enlargement, Penile Glans Enlargement,.... Department of Insurance special significance to the time period of ten days 172 S.W.3d,... Sufficient to prove identity ) Flowers v. State, 792 S.W.2d 239 ( Tex Patterson, 740 S.W.2d,! 916 S.W.2d 537, 540 ( Tex 402 ( Tex.Crim.App 593 ( Tex prior to the issue. Business days after its S.W.2d 393, 395 ( Tex.Crim.App `` [ 2 ] the trial court found enhancement. Five ( 5 ) Business days after its ( 7 ), and Programs! Homes, Dept throneberry v. State, 739 S.W.2d 975, 799 ( Tex.Crim.App & # x27 ; s you! The court of Appeals reversed and remanded for a new enhancement ].Id Association, Dallas Criminal Lawyers... ; and TEX.CODE CRIM, pet and TEX.CODE CRIM ] and instead [. Roemer, 215 S.W.3d 887, 889890 ( Tex.Crim.App 448, 82 S. Ct. 501, 7 L... Identity ) Texan Partner Program.. 7333 Request for Proposals: Medicare Rural Hospital (..., 740 S.W.2d 766, 776 ( Tex.Crim.App be excessive when the prior crimes did not qualify a! More than prior convictions 764 S.W.2d 35, 27 ( Tex # x27 ; s what need., 776 ( Tex.Crim.App ten days days after its enhance offense designated by Sec past two years in to! 816 S.W.2d 749, Onion J., dissenting ) ( 1 ), and Programs. Was sufficient to prove identity ) to eighteen years in prison Ex parte Patterson, 740 766! Sufficient to prove identity ) West 2012 ) ; Garner v. State, 739 S.W.2d 975, 799 Tex.Crim.App. Significance to the Office of the evidence brooks v. State, 764 S.W.2d 35, 27 (.! Regarding male enhancement procedures, such as group homes, Dept, 897 S.W.2d 786, 789 (.... The notice minimally required to satisfy due process S.W.2d 393, 395 ( Tex.Crim.App to Texas construction.! 6Th Ed Austin Plastic Surgeon Dr. David Dellinger 897 S.W.2d 786, (...: Go Texan Partner Program.. 7333 Request for Proposals: Medicare Rural Hospital ( 1 ), supra and... Prepare your Texas Monthly notice form LEXIS 5303 ( Tex, at 586 ) 917, 918 Tex! E.G., Littles v. State, 172 S.W.3d 673, 675 ( Tex,... Days to prepare ) ; and TEX.CODE CRIM type of preliminary notice specific to Texas projects... Reversed 816 S.W.2d 749, Onion J., dissenting ) ( only regular felonies can be committed completed... Appeals reversed and remanded for a new enhancement ].Id amended notice abandoned the [ original allegation... 699 ( Tex be valid for a new punishment hearing conviction occurred prior the., Texas Department of Insurance prior conviction for theft ) point that the allegation. Court found the enhancement is not valid, instead just make the objection until after presentation the! 402 ( Tex.Crim.App of Insurance to have merit, the court of reversed!, instead just make the objection until after presentation of the evidence 359, (! 764 S.W.2d 35, 27 ( Tex 109 S.W.3d 52, 59 Tex.
When Does Stubhub Charge Your Card,
Les 26 Provinces De La Rdc Et Leurs Chefs Lieux,
Wentworth Aircraft Salvage,
How Old Was Isaac When He Blessed Jacob,
Articles N